Closed dimqua closed 6 years ago
For that it'd also be nice to have a flavor that doesn't require the proprietary Play Services Ads and Crashlytics, which are no-goes for F-Droid.
Possible? Thanks in advance!
Hello,
Thank you for your message, Of course I would like to do that, I have some questions about it can we continue with email mr.mustafa.ozhan@gmail.com
Sorry, but no. My mail server will "reject" mails coming from gmail.com (I don't want a bunch of 3rd parties reading my mails). What's so secret about your questions they cannot be discussed in an issue? Not sure, but if it's really needed, doesn't Github offer making an issue "confidential"?
@mustafaozhan you don't necessarily need to do it by yourself, the F-Droid team can add your apps (sooner or later), but (at least) they need your public approval of doing so.
@IzzySoft It is not secret I just didn't want to have a long conversation here 😄 As @dimqua guessed already, my question is about the process of building and adding app to F-Droid.
How is the way for dealing it ? For example right now latest apk in Google Play Store is approximately 5-6 commits behind of my repository in GitHub. Is F-Droid using latest commit of master branch ?
Secondly I do not wan to create second flavor for F-Droid without Play Services Ads and Crashlytics, I want to have same apk on both platform also collect and keep track statistic of my Apps via Fabric Crashlytics.
First hint is to https://f-droid.org/docs – where you should find all those details (well, happy reading, it's quite a lot :wink:) So in short:
Ugh. Would you at least attache the APK file to its corresponding release tag, so I could add it to my repo until remaining issues have been sorted out?
Hello,
You can find the apk which is in the store now from here. This apk is how is it in the Play store. Nowadays I am trying to write backed for this app in order to increase number of currencies 32 to 170 + so that's why project is in big mess now.
Sorry, I cannot grab from Dropbox – and others are unlikely to find it there. Why not simply attaching it to its corresponding tag here?
Because some of the files not included in repository for privacy also current master is with new API integration which is not fully supported yet none of the commit has the same version with the real-time app. I am not able to put apk to here. It says We do not support that file type.
apk.zip Wait I found a workaround When the new release of app (with new backed) will be live and i will add release tag that time and organize the project let you know here. Until that time you can use this apk.
I am not able to put apk to here. It says We do not support that file type.
No idea where you've tried and how, but there are plenty of app repos who do attach it there. I guess that's done when editing the tag to make it a release (e.g. when you add a changelog or other release notes). Guess that's what you just found out. I'll then wait for that release, so I can setup everything on my end properly. Please let me know here then when it's ready. And please attach it there as plain .apk
, not as *.zip
. Thanks!
Please find the apk file at release. It is signed apk and +170 currencies implemented. Do not try to compile with source code because API private keys are not included in git.
Regards.
For both of app release apks added. I do not know how we will give update in future but I will contiune to create releases when apps have big changes so you can follow the apks like this ? is it okay for you?
Thanks, Mustafa! I just grabbed the first one and checked it. As stated above, it still comes with too many trackers even for my repo:
While rules for my repo are certainly more relax than for the official one, this unfortunately is even too much for that: more than 2 trackers I don't accept. Could you do with less trackers (best without of course)?
As for updates: As long as you'd create new tags with the corresponding APK attached, my auto-updater would grab them (usually within 24h).
@mustafaozhan any chance to get a FOSS flavor coming without those 4, so inclusion with the official repo can be completed? Please let us know (even if the answer is no).
For both of app I decided to not put in F-Droid because I do not want a variant without Fabric
and AdMob
. I uploaded apk because there are only 2 tracker but as i can see your scan recognising AdMob as 2 different tracker GMS
and Google Ads
. Also I do not have any idea from where Doubleclick
came from
I guess AdMob includes the other two automatically nowadays (though in the past it were different "services"). And GMS comes in as at least one of them relies on GMS (my guess is AdMob; AFAIR AdMob services are integrated with GMS).
A pity you won't offer a tracking-free version. For privacy oriented users, those are no-gos. So I take it I can close the F-Droid ticket (just done). If you decide otherwise, please update this ticket here (or the other at F-Droid) and we check again.
I think it'd be nice to add the app to F-Droid. @mustafaozhan are you OK with it? See also: https://gitlab.com/fdroid/rfp/issues/764