Alternative Solutions: Entropia

[AxialDark]

What should be written? What exactly should this section communicate to the reader?

Related to #5

[AxialDark]

Ready for review: sections/introduction/Relatedwork/entropia

[dkalaxdk]

Reviewed.

[zaztz]

Reviewed

[zaztz]

Christian review checklist

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section.
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it.
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[dkalaxdk]

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section.
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it.
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[AxialDark]

Afsnittet er blevet omskrevet for at være mere relevant for rapporten. Derfor er der store ændringer i teksten.

[AxialDark]

Kigget og rettet kommentare

[zaztz]

Reviewed igen.

[dkalaxdk]

Reviewed, no comments added.

[AxialDark]

In Done