Alternative solutions: CLAAUDIA

P7-Team / P7-Report

0 stars 0 forks source link

Closed AxialDark closed 2 years ago

AxialDark commented 3 years ago

What should be written? What exactly should this section communicate to the reader?

Related to #5

AxialDark commented 3 years ago

Ready for review: sections/introduction/Relatedwork/clauudia

dkalaxdk commented 3 years ago

Reviewed.

soenderby commented 3 years ago

Reviewed

dkalaxdk commented 3 years ago

[x] The section is relevant for the report. Har smidt en kommentar ang ovenstående.
[x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
[x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
[x] There is a rød tråd.
[x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
[x] There is a good segue from the previous section.
[x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it.
[x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
[x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
[ ] Is there anything missing?

soenderby commented 3 years ago

[x] The section is relevant for the report.
[x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
[x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
[x] There is a rød tråd.
[x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
[x] There is a good segue from the previous section.
[x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it.
[x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
[x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
[ ] Is there anything missing?

Top marks :)