Design database schemas

[Kaliahh]

Tasks:

• [x] What data should we store?
• [x] ER diagrams
• [x] Argumentation! ;)
• [x] Does the schema conform to normal form?

Link til reviewers

[dkalaxdk]

@dkalaxdk

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs. There are jumps, but can't see a way of avoiding it.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[dkalaxdk]

@MikaelVM

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[AxialDark]

File(s) for review at: "sections/design/database/ER.tex"

[AxialDark]

@dkalaxdk @MikaelVM Because an error was found in the ER diagram (missing distinguisher for byzantine checking), there is also a pull request to be reviewed. It can be found at: https://github.com/P7-Team/P7-WebService/pull/56

[AxialDark]

Everything is good, moved to Done