Ret Golem afsnittet til

[Kaliahh]

Fokus på:

• Hvad gør de, og hvorfor?
• Hvorfor løser de ikke vores problem?
• Hvilke ideer havde de der var gode, som vi tager med videre, og hvorfor?

[dkalaxdk]

@MikaelVM

• [ ] The section is relevant for the report.
• [ ] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [ ] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [ ] There is a rød tråd.
• [ ] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [ ] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [ ] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [ ] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [ ] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[dkalaxdk]

@zaztz

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [ ] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[Kaliahh]

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd. Dette kunne måske afhjælpes med nogle overskrifter
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [ ] There is a good segue from the previous section Not relevant in my opinion
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it Definitioner af ord
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [ ] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?