Ret Rendering til

[Kaliahh]

Skal omskrives så det ligner Data Analysis afsnittet.

Hav fokus på:

• Hvad er det?
• Hvorfor fungerer det ikke på én maskine
• Hvorfor fungerer det bedre på flere maskiner?
• Hvad tager vi med fra vores undersøgelse af dette problem / Hvad har vi lært?

[dkalaxdk]

@AxialDark

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue. NOTE: Technically speaking the quesion "Hvorfor fungere det ikke på en maskine?" is not answered, but the question itself does not really make sense to me.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[dkalaxdk]

@dkalaxdk

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?