Introduction - Development process

[AxialDark]

What should be written? What development process have we used? Why have we choosen this process? What changes have we made to better fit the project

[AxialDark]

Review at: sections/introduction/process

[dkalaxdk]

@zaztz

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [ ] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• Synes der er en mangle på beskrivelse af vores review processer samt at vi valget at bruge userstorys
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [ ] There is a good segue from the previous section
• Denne section virker som den ikke relation til de tidligere sectioner og den som kommer efter den. Derfor vil jeg foreslå at den bliver flytte frem eller tilbage.
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[dkalaxdk]

@dkalaxdk

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[AxialDark]

Fixed