We need to talk about quality of service, and how we do it, somewhere.

Kaliahh commented 2 years ago

We might just have to say that we use Digital Ocean, and use their stuff, at least for availability

AxialDark commented 2 years ago

Review file: "sections/evaluation/quality_of_service"

AxialDark commented 2 years ago

@dkalaxdk

[x] The section is relevant for the report.
[x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
[x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
[ ] There is a rød tråd.
[ ] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
[x] There is a good segue from the previous section
[x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
[x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
[ ] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
[ ] Is there anything missing?

AxialDark commented 2 years ago

Ane

[x] The section is relevant for the report.
[x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
[x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
[x] There is a rød tråd.
[x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
[x] There is a good segue from the previous section Ikke relevant efter min mening
[x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
[x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
[x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
[ ] Is there anything missing?

AxialDark commented 2 years ago

Reviews fixed, done

P7-Team / P7-Report