Process

[Kaliahh]

Write about the process in each of the following sections:

• [x] Introduction
• [x] Implementation (TDD)
• [x] Evaluation (Usability testing) (Impossible, as we have not done them)
• [x] Our Process
  • [x] Opsummering, andre tanker?
  • [x] Kig på vores review og retrospective dokumenter, tag ting med fra det.
  • [x] Hvordan brugte vi Scrum?
  • [x] Hvordan gik det med vores sprints?
  • [x] Hvad skete der i dem?
  • [x] Tal her om vores definition of done og vores review proces

[AxialDark]

Files to review list:

• sections/introduction/process_introduction
• sections/implementation/process_tdd
• sections/discussion/process

[AxialDark]

@soenderby

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[AxialDark]

Ane

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[AxialDark]

Yeeeeeassssssh!