Discuss Design

[Kaliahh]

Diskuter designet så godt som vi nu kan. Vi har ikke lavet design criteria, og kan derfor ikke sige om designet er godt. Vi har lavet en analayse på quality of service (#52), måske vi kan sige noget ud fra det?

52 Skal derfor også være færdig først

[AxialDark]

@AxialDark

• [x] The section is relevant for the report.
• [x] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [x] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [x] There is a rød tråd.
• [x] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [x] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [x] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [x] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [x] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?

[AxialDark]

@dkalaxdk

• [ ] The section is relevant for the report.
• [ ] It communicates and covers the information required by the issue.
• [ ] The section is reasonably concise and gets to the point.
• [ ] There is a rød tråd.
• [ ] There are no jarring jumps between paragraphs.
• [ ] There is a good segue from the previous section
• [ ] The section is written in such a way that a new reader, who has read the report up until the section, would understand it
• [ ] The sections uses the type of language agreed upon
• [ ] All claims have citations, and the claims can be logically derived from those citations.
• [ ] Is there anything missing?