search

PATRIC3 / patric3_website

Legacy PATRIC Website (JBoss Portal Version)
MIT License
5 stars 2 forks source link

Need to use RefSeq locus tags on genome browser #1098

Closed ARWattam closed 8 years ago

ARWattam commented 8 years ago

You will see the problem here. I searched for BAB2_1016, which was listed in a paper. I am trying to find the intergenic region, where there is a specific sequence that I want to see. I open the genome browser and....Where is it? I see the name at the top of the page, but instead of seeing the RefSeq locus tag I was searching for, I see a protein accession number. I don't know the protein accession number for this feature. Totally confused. Mouse over, and can't see anything. To quote The Donald,,..."sad"

screen shot 2016-10-15 at 10 56 09 am
aswarren commented 8 years ago

This is not a bug. Especially since we discussed this before the workshop and decided to see what people thought about it. That being said, this is easily changed.

ARWattam commented 8 years ago

What they want to see are the RefSeq locus tags. They don't like the accession numbers.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Warren" notifications@github.com To: "PATRIC3" patric3_website@noreply.github.com Cc: "Rebecca Wattam" wattam@vbi.vt.edu, "Author" author@noreply.github.com Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:33:02 AM Subject: Re: [PATRIC3/patric3_website] Need to use RefSeq locus tags on genome browser (#1098)

This is not a bug. Especially since we discussed this before the workshop and decided to see what people thought about it.

You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/PATRIC3/patric3_website/issues/1098#issuecomment-254798663

mshukla1 commented 8 years ago

Fine, not a bug if it was intentional to get user feedback. However, we have the feedback from users now, so it needs to be changed to RefSeq locus tags. -MaulikOn Oct 19, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Andrew Warren notifications@github.com wrote:This is not a bug. Especially since we discussed this before the workshop and decided to see what people thought about it.—You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

{"api_version":"1.0","publisher":{"api_key":"05dde50f1d1a384dd78767c55493e4bb","name":"GitHub"},"entity":{"external_key":"github/PATRIC3/patric3_website","title":"PATRIC3/patric3_website","subtitle":"GitHub repository","main_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/17495839/a5054eac-5d88-11e6-95fc-7290892c7bb5.png","avatar_image_url":"https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/143418/15842166/7c72db34-2c0b-11e6-9aed-b52498112777.png","action":{"name":"Open in GitHub","url":"https://github.com/PATRIC3/patric3_website"}},"updates":{"snippets":[{"icon":"PERSON","message":"@aswarren in #1098: This is not a bug. Especially since we discussed this before the workshop and decided to see what people thought about it."}],"action":{"name":"View Issue","url":"https://github.com/PATRIC3/patric3_website/issues/1098#issuecomment-254798663"}}}