The crash in the proteome comparison tool at the tutorial this week was a result of feature fig|1945512.3.peg.14 not having a translation. That feature derived from the genbank file https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP019799.1 which has no translations at all in it. The feature in question is this:
gene complement(8925..9241)
/locus_tag="B0D95_00035"
/pseudo
CDS complement(8925..9241)
/locus_tag="B0D95_00035"
/inference="COORDINATES: similar to AA
sequence:RefSeq:WP_007644411.1"
/note="frameshifted; Derived by automated computational
analysis using gene prediction method: Protein Homology."
/pseudo
/codon_start=1
/transl_table=11
/product="hypothetical protein"
Presumably the rest of the features were also called by our own gene callers and thus had translations. (Genome output is in /PATRIC@patricbrc.org/home/Reference Data/Genomes_from_GenBank/Mar2017/GCA_002007605.1/.GCA_002007605.1/GCA_002007605.1.genome)
We should probably add a pass in the annotation service that attempts a translation on any features missing one.
The crash in the proteome comparison tool at the tutorial this week was a result of feature fig|1945512.3.peg.14 not having a translation. That feature derived from the genbank file https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CP019799.1 which has no translations at all in it. The feature in question is this:
Presumably the rest of the features were also called by our own gene callers and thus had translations. (Genome output is in /PATRIC@patricbrc.org/home/Reference Data/Genomes_from_GenBank/Mar2017/GCA_002007605.1/.GCA_002007605.1/GCA_002007605.1.genome)
We should probably add a pass in the annotation service that attempts a translation on any features missing one.