re-build after merging

[davidfarmer]

Use this pull request instead.

[Alex-Jordan]

OK, just got around to pulling this onto a test branch and trying it. Looks like a lot of broken syntax. I got so many issues scrolling past I'm not sure I could catalog them all, so maybe we can try to trim them down a few at a time.

It looks like in many places where you should have closing figure tags, now there are open figure tags.

In some places, there is stuff like this: <figure xml:id= xml:id="fig_trip7" >

I get a lot of open/close tag mismatches, but they could be consequences of these first two things. Did you configure Makefile.paths so that you can run make check? Or otherwise run xmllint on the output, and you can see all (many of?) the errors.

[davidfarmer]

Looks like I forgot to re-run xmllint after my last round of changes. Looking at it now.

On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, Alex Jordan wrote:

OK, just got around to pulling this onto a test branch and trying it. Looks like a lot of broken syntax. I got so many issues scrolling past I'm not sure I could catalog them all, so maybe we can try to trim them down a few at a time.

It looks like in many places where you should have closing figure tags, now there are open figure tags.

In some places, there is stuff like this:

I get a lot of open/close tag mismatches, but they could be consequences of these first two things. Did you configure Makefile.paths so that you can run make check? Or otherwise run xmllint on the output, and you can see all (many of?) the errors. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.[AAM6LIL8LmkiCl_ww21HwfomvHOLdTTtks5qmfiigaJpZM4Jvr6e.gif]

[davidfarmer]

I fixed at least some of those problems.

Running against the DTD shows a lot more errors, which I think are due to the new WeBWorK framework

Let's just try to fix one thing at a time. Let me know the next problem you find.

If you prefer, I can re-make this as a completely fresh pull request.

On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, Alex Jordan wrote:

OK, just got around to pulling this onto a test branch and trying it. Looks like a lot of broken syntax. I got so many issues scrolling past I'm not sure I could catalog them all, so maybe we can try to trim them down a few at a time.

It looks like in many places where you should have closing figure tags, now there are open figure tags.

In some places, there is stuff like this:

I get a lot of open/close tag mismatches, but they could be consequences of these first two things. Did you configure Makefile.paths so that you can run make check? Or otherwise run xmllint on the output, and you can see all (many of?) the errors. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.[AAM6LIL8LmkiCl_ww21HwfomvHOLdTTtks5qmfiigaJpZM4Jvr6e.gif]

[Alex-Jordan]

OK, I just checked this out locally and set the image-making to run. Should be done when I come back later and I can count that we still have the same number of images. Then I'll make the html and look around to see if I notice anything amiss.

I notice now that we have no provision for a simple "answer" in a "webwork", as opposed to a "solution", and the DTD is objecting to an this. I'll post in the main MBX forum about this because it leads to an MBX design question.

[Alex-Jordan]

Can you only apply these new edits to files other than sec_limit_intro.mbx? Certain things appear to have gotten messed with. In particular what I notice is the webwork exercises have lost a lot of their structure and been turned into the simple templates.

[davidfarmer]

I put back the original sec_limit_intro.mbx

[Alex-Jordan]

Working well, except for some bugs with unescaped < that I missed the last time I made a commit.