Closed davidfarmer closed 8 years ago
I just double checked that this didn't change anything I had done on sec_limits_analytically. I think Alex should approve this one though.
Can you tell me about the xref commit here? It seems to have done the opposite of what we want. It looks like it undid the few manual fixes we had made in the early sections. An xref inside an mrow needs to not be encased in \text{} or MathJax doesn't handle the whole situation correctly.
Yes, what Alex said. It wasn't working before and you just changed it back to what wasn't working. Unless you have fixed something in the mathbook distribution.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Alex Jordan notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you tell me about the xref commit here? It seems to have done the opposite of what we want. It looks like it undid the few manual fixes we had made in the early sections. An xref inside an mrow needs to not be encased in \text{} or MathJax doesn't handle the whole situation correctly.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PCCMathSAC/apex-mbx/pull/44#issuecomment-247487312, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGBt640zRKhF6tFtYVAb5WovaMOSTVwBks5qqdwagaJpZM4J-WgV .
Carly Vollet Mathematics Instructor Math Department Co-Chair Math Club Faculty Advisor PCC Cascade, SSB 321 971-722-5564
I see that I read backward what Carly wrote.
It is the last commit I made. Does that make it easy to undo?
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, CVollet wrote:
Yes, what Alex said. It wasn't working before and you just changed it back to what wasn't working. Unless you have fixed something in the mathbook distribution.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Alex Jordan notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you tell me about the xref commit here? It seems to have done the opposite of what we want. It looks like it undid the few manual fixes we had made in the early sections. An xref inside an mrow needs to not be encased in \text{} or MathJax doesn't handle the whole situation correctly.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PCCMathSAC/apex-mbx/pull/44#issuecomment-247487312, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGBt640zRKhF6tFtYVAb5WovaMOSTVwBks5qqdwagaJpZM4J-WgV .
Carly Vollet Mathematics Instructor Math Department Co-Chair Math Club Faculty Advisor PCC Cascade, SSB 321 971-722-5564
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.[AAM6LE4bahoFCHh0ZdQbBklWRQLhn2Z2ks5qqdx4gaJpZM4J-WgV.gif]
Closing. Use the other pull request I just submitted.
\epsilon --> \varepsilon
|x| --> \abs{x} ||x|| --> \norm{x}
Removed the "\," in f\,^{(n)}