Closed davidfarmer closed 7 years ago
OK, thanks for the initiative here. I should probably be doing these though, because sometimes I'll be coding randomization into the problem that will be at odds with a specific title. I get the simplicity of how titles can be though, and I'll follow your lead.
I am just proposing very short titles as an option. Best practices will emerge as we get used to doing new things. I am still trying to grasp the idea of having so many WW problems. I had assumed most of the book would look like the PDF, with a few WW here and there.
Looks like there will be no conflicts between this and the webwork editing I'm in the middle of. Planning to finish that, update #47 if that is still open (or make a new PR if necessary) then merge this one.
I'm not comfortable enough with github to deal with the conflicts in this pull request.
I'm still finishing WeBWorK conversions for this section. As I mentioned above, not planning to merge this until I'm done. So I'm glad you didn't try ;)
Locally addressed conflicts and pushed. This commit is on master now. And the result is visible at http://spot.pcc.edu/math/APEXCalculus/sec_limit_analytically.html.
I added short titles to the WW exercises in sec_limit_analytically, and also wrapped a up in a p (which may or may not address part of an issue I just submitted).