Open durack1 opened 10 hours ago
So, in what way would you prefer that field to be populated?
We just add a global attribute, "license_id", with value "CC BY 4.0", to all files. The current "license" attribute is fine as it is.
We just add a global attribute, "license_id", with value "CC BY 4.0", to all files. The current "license" attribute is fine as it is.
We can do that of course. Btw. is there some official documentation for the global metadata? Such as required and optional attributes together with their format requirements and best practices? That would be good to have, instead of going back and forth with GH issue comments, you could point people there.
We're trying, but it's a work in progress and lots of things to do. The tool that best captures it (in my opinion) is https://github.com/climate-resource/input4mips_validation. However, as you can see, there's still lots of things we're not capturing (specifically https://github.com/climate-resource/input4mips_validation/issues/73, https://github.com/climate-resource/input4mips_validation/issues/76).
Some more details are here: https://github.com/PCMDI/input4MIPs_CVs/issues/15. As you can tell, the rules are fuzzy and hard to trace so I would say that the tool linked above is really the most concrete (because it's written in code, not words).
And sorry @st-bender this is the list of licenses that we are recommending, pick and choose your flavour (of which we are only recommending 1, but could conceivably deal with a CC0 if someone absolutely wanted it)
As a backstory all modelling groups in CMIP6, aside from 1, went with the CC BY 4.0 license, with a single group going CC0 (see here)
Btw. is there some official documentation for the global metadata? Such as required and optional attributes together with their format requirements and best practices? That would be good to have, instead of going back and forth with GH issue comments, you could point people there.
This is a good suggestion, but not quite in place. The best reference is the CMIP6 guidance document, which can be viewed here - for e.g. license_id
is not something that we had in CMIP6.. The rest is very similar, as is the DRS/directory structure and filenames
Issues to solve:
Files have a valid license identifier but not the "license_id" attribute that is being lifted to populate webpages, e.g.,
@znichollscr @st-bender @berndfunke ping - just a note for a very trivial clean up in the next version