The latest changes to deck legality eliminated some basically-valid but not strictly-legal decks (primarily helmed by planeswalkers). I was already musing on a acorn version of legality, but now I'm thinking about a fuller "include common rule-0 legality".
This probably looks like splitting up notion of is_pdh_legal on the Deck model. We can store attributes like legal_99, legal_commanders, planeswalker_commanders, acorn_cards, etc. instead. Then, we need to plumb that through into the main views on the site so that viewers can select their preferred level of rules adherence.
The latest changes to deck legality eliminated some basically-valid but not strictly-legal decks (primarily helmed by planeswalkers). I was already musing on a
acornversion of legality, but now I'm thinking about a fuller "include common rule-0 legality".This probably looks like splitting up notion of
is_pdh_legalon theDeckmodel. We can store attributes likelegal_99,legal_commanders,planeswalker_commanders,acorn_cards, etc. instead. Then, we need to plumb that through into the main views on the site so that viewers can select their preferred level of rules adherence.