Comparison with DB:L;*LISP 155 and ES:L;*LISP 155 shows differences

[eswenson1]

I compared *LISP 155 between ES and DB and noticed that they were different. This indicates that whoever made this change did not follow the correct protocol of updating the version number. Here are the differences:

ES*:srccom ex:l;*lisp 155,es:l;*lisp 155

;COMPARISON OF EX:L;*LISP 155 AND DSK:L;*LISP 155
;OPTIONS ARE    /3

**** FILE EX:L;*LISP 155, 32-65 (62994)
ifn its,[
;; Used in QIO
mchcnt==:20                    ;max #ITS
mchtab: block mchcnt           ;.SEE INIMCH
]
**** FILE DSK:L;*LISP 155, 33-2 (62995)
***************

**** FILE EX:L;*LISP 155, 205-42 (394628)
        pushj p,sixatm
**** FILE DSK:L;*LISP 155, 205-42 (394523)
        HLRZS TT
    IRP X,,[AI,ML,MC,MD,MX,DB,KA,ES]
        CAIN TT,(SIXBIT \X\)
         MOVEI A,Q!X
    TERMIN
***************

:KILL  NEX◊J
ES*

We should revert this change to version 155, and create a version 156 with this change.