Closed dweindl closed 4 years ago
for the library, just continue using the current a.b.c format, not?
is there actually a need for a petab_version
in the yaml files then? or should it rather be in the petab releasenotes, it is mentioned once a new format version is introduced, and in the yamls, only the format version is mentioned?
done in #231
As the library will change much more frequently, and as some users may rather be interested in the file format, it would make sense to use independent version numbers. For the data format, I'd use just integers. For the library ideally semantic versioning.