Closed dweindl closed 2 years ago
Merging #133 (d540c47) into develop (7a0b77e) will increase coverage by
0.11%
. The diff coverage is74.04%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #133 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 77.14% 77.25% +0.11%
===========================================
Files 26 29 +3
Lines 2437 2572 +135
Branches 579 593 +14
===========================================
+ Hits 1880 1987 +107
- Misses 404 428 +24
- Partials 153 157 +4
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
petab/lint.py | 67.55% <51.85%> (-0.30%) |
:arrow_down: |
petab/problem.py | 67.19% <64.91%> (-0.58%) |
:arrow_down: |
petab/parameters.py | 88.19% <71.42%> (+0.30%) |
:arrow_up: |
petab/models/model.py | 72.00% <72.00%> (ø) |
|
petab/parameter_mapping.py | 70.15% <78.26%> (-0.18%) |
:arrow_down: |
petab/models/sbml_model.py | 91.37% <91.37%> (ø) |
|
petab/models/__init__.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
petab/observables.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7a0b77e...d540c47. Read the comment docs.
Add abstraction for models. This helps to keep libsbml code closely together and to potentially accommodate non-SBML models in the future(https://github.com/PEtab-dev/PEtab/pull/538).
Wraps
libsbml.Model
usingpetab.models.Model
and replaces the respective function arguments. In the (what I consider) most relevant function for downstream use, thesbml_model
argument is kept, but deprecated.