PHI-base / curation

PHI-base curation
0 stars 0 forks source link

PMID:22906850 Effect of DMI-resistance mechanisms on cross-resistance patterns, fitness parameters and aflatoxin production in Aspergillus parasiticus Speare #208

Open jingluodatacurator opened 6 months ago

jingluodatacurator commented 6 months ago

Curated by @jingluodatacurator

https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/9c3254c570ce9eb4

jingluodatacurator commented 6 months ago

Notes:

Uniprot id: J9XNG1, from accession number given (JX312359) in Fig. 2 text. Strains: ATCC 15517 Main expt. for curation: (2.3) A suspension of 108 conidia ml-1 conidia of the wild-type strain of A. parasiticus, obtained from 10 to 15-day-old slant cultures, was exposed to ultraviolet irradiation (TUV Philips, 15 W, 254 nm) for 4 min, which resulted in 92% lethality. After irradiation they were kept for 30 min in the dark to minimize photorepair of radiation damage, and then placed on CZA agar medium amended with 25 lg ml-1 flusilazole, and incubated at 30 oC for 20 days, to enable resistant colonies to appear. (3.1) From this initial screening a representative sample of twelve mutant strains, three from R1 and nine from R2 phenotype, where chosen for further studies. The R1 mutant strains were moderate resistant to flusilazole, with a resistance factor (Rf) based on EC50 values ranging from 25 to 30. On the contrary, the R2 phenotypic class included mutants with a low to moderate level of resistance (Rf: 10–12, based on EC50s) to flusilazole (Table 2).

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

Hi @jingluodatacurator, are you still working on this session or is it ready for checking please?

jingluodatacurator commented 5 months ago

Hi @jingluodatacurator, are you still working on this session or is it ready for checking please?

Hi @CuzickA, I believe my initial curation has been completed for review please, thanks.

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

Current annotations image

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

Checking UniProt

Uniprot id: J9XNG1, from accession number given (JX312359) in Fig. 2 text.

This is incorrect as this accession number (JX312359) is for mdr gene NOT Cyp51A or Cyp51B. (Cyp51A has been curated in the screenshot above) image

Text on p798 just below Fig2 provides gene ids for Cyp51A and Cyp51B image

Looking up 'JX312357' in UniProt gives

https://www.uniprot.org/uniprotkb/J9XQH7/entry

Hi @jingluodatacurator, please change the incorrect Cyp51A uniprot id to J9XQH7

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

Checking strain

Strains: ATCC 15517

Strains listed in the annotations above are 'ZB1' and 'ZG8'.

These do not match with 'Strains: ATCC 15517' in the notes section above.

Hi @jingluodatacurator, please could you check this and write up a couple of notes here to summarise the expt.

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

There is genotype expression data available

It looks as though the expression level of WT Cyp51A vs Cyp51A with G54W mutation could be classed as expression 'wild type product level' as all close to '1' rather than 'not assayed'.

image

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

Hi @jingluodatacurator, please check that the conditions reflect the info in '2.4. In vitro fungitoxicity bioassays' rather than in '2.3. Mutation induction'. (This has been noted in your personal curation checklist 'On adding annotations of figures and conditions: they should reflect the phenotype expt rather than the creation of the mutants.')

CuzickA commented 5 months ago

Next steps 1) @jingluodatacurator, please look through and address comments above. DONE 2) AC and JL, Once step 1 has been completed, consider whether we can curate any of the 'fitness' expts in Table 3. 3) AC try and add in AE alteration archetype info DONE 09_02_2024 4) AC decide whether new strains need adding to list. DONE 09_02_2024

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Summary of expt. :

(2.3. Mutation induction) A suspension of 108 conidia ml-1 conidia of the wild-type strain of A. parasiticus, obtained from 10 to 15-day-old slant cultures, was exposed to ultraviolet irradiation (TUV Philips, 15 W, 254 nm) for 4 min, which resulted in 92% lethality. After irradiation they were kept for 30 min in the dark to minimize photorepair of radiation damage, and then placed on CZA agar medium amended with 25 lg ml-1 flusilazole, and incubated at 30 C for 20 days, to enableresistant colonies to appear. The selected resistant isolates were maintained on CZA agar slants containing 5 lg ml-1 flusilazole, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for the wild-type parent strains of A. parasiticus.

(2.4. In vitro fungitoxicity bioassays) The fungicide sensitivity of the wild-type and mutant strains was assessed by inoculating CZA medium plates with 2mm mycelial plugs cut from CZA medium on which conidia of A. parasiticus had been allowed to germinate, after overnight incubation at 30 C. The fungicides were added aseptically to sterilized growth medium from stock solutions, prior to inoculation. In all cases, the final amount of solvent never exceeded 1% (v/v) in treated and control samples. At least six concentrations with three replicas for each fungicide were used to obtain the respective fungitoxicity curves. Control plates without fungicide received an equivalent amount of solvent. The effect of the fungicide on radial growth was determined by measuring the diameter of mycelial colonies after incubation for 8 days at 30 C in the dark. The EC50 and the EC90 values were determined from dose–response curves after probit analysis.

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Uniprot ID: J9XQH7 Author has provided provided Cyp51A (JX312357) and Cyp51B (JX312358), only JX312357 was used to find the ID J9XQH7 for Cyp51A as analysis of deduced amino acid sequence of cyp51B showed that no mutations were associated with DMI resistance.

Strains: wild type strain ATCC15517 was used for UV mutagenesis expt.

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Genotype creation:

ZG11, ZG8, ZB1 have been curated for all three fungicides flusilazole, tebuconazole, imazalil. I'm not sure about the allele type for ZG11, @CuzickA please check thanks.

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Curation completed pending review by @CuzickA thanks.

https://canto.phi-base.org/curs/9c3254c570ce9eb4

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Hi @jingluodatacurator, genotypes, phenotypes and conditions look good :-)

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Add new pathogen species 1350924 Add new strain d621790

Next step for AC 1) add new PHIPO and PHI-ECO terms _DONE 13_022024 2) check AE archetype with Nichola

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

AE alteration in archetype

From Nichola's Table S2 image

cyp51A(aaG54W)[WT level] 'G70W; Cyp51A; ASPEFU'

image

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Next step

AC and JL, Once step 1 has been completed, consider whether we can curate any of the 'fitness' expts in Table 3.

@jingluodatacurator, did you see anything else we could curate from Table 3?

image

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Next step

AC and JL, Once step 1 has been completed, consider whether we can curate any of the 'fitness' expts in Table 3.

@jingluodatacurator, did you see anything else we could curate from Table 3?

image

Hi @CuzickA, I can not find the host species/gene in the paper in order to curate sporulation and germination data, could you help me out on this please thanks.

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Next step

AC and JL, Once step 1 has been completed, consider whether we can curate any of the 'fitness' expts in Table 3.

@jingluodatacurator, did you see anything else we could curate from Table 3? image

Hi @CuzickA, I can not find the host species/gene in the paper in order to curate sporulation and germination data, could you help me out on this please thanks.

Hi @jingluodatacurator, these look like pathogen only phenotypes. See info in '2.5. Determination of ecological fitness parameters and aflatoxin production'. We are not currently curating the aflatoxin production expt. - although maybe we could also try and do this.

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Next step

AC and JL, Once step 1 has been completed, consider whether we can curate any of the 'fitness' expts in Table 3.

@jingluodatacurator, did you see anything else we could curate from Table 3? image

Hi @CuzickA, I can not find the host species/gene in the paper in order to curate sporulation and germination data, could you help me out on this please thanks.

Hi @jingluodatacurator, these look like pathogen only phenotypes. See info in '2.5. Determination of ecological fitness parameters and aflatoxin production'. We are not currently curating the aflatoxin production expt. - although maybe we could also try and do this.

Ok @CuzickA, so what's your suggestion here for further action, thanks.

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Next step

AC and JL, Once step 1 has been completed, consider whether we can curate any of the 'fitness' expts in Table 3.

@jingluodatacurator, did you see anything else we could curate from Table 3? image

Hi @CuzickA, I can not find the host species/gene in the paper in order to curate sporulation and germination data, could you help me out on this please thanks.

Hi @jingluodatacurator, these look like pathogen only phenotypes. See info in '2.5. Determination of ecological fitness parameters and aflatoxin production'. We are not currently curating the aflatoxin production expt. - although maybe we could also try and do this.

Ok @CuzickA, so what's your suggestion here for further action, thanks.

Hi @jingluodatacurator, I'm suggesting you curate the sporulation and germination data as pathogen only phenotypes if these expts were done without a host.

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Hi @CuzickA, I have curated pathogen only phenotypes for sporulation and germination data (I have tried my best!), however am not sure if they are correct, please check thanks.

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Note to self

strain ZG11 corresponds to genotype cyp51A+[Overexpression]

Strains ZG8 and ZB1 correspond to genotype cyp51A(aaG54W)[WT level]

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Current annotations image

Text from paper 'Comparison of sporulation and spore germination between DMI-resistant mutants and the wild-type parent strain of A. parasiticus showed that with the exception of ZG11 isolate, these fitness parameters were significantly reduced in all other mutant strains tested (Table 3).'

Hi @jingluodatacurator, good job on having a go with these and finding some of the 'spore' PHIPO terms. Looking at the text and Table 3 it might be that these annotations have been made to the wrong genotype. Please could you have another look?

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

A note about which PHIPO term to use for @jingluodatacurator

For 'reduced asexual sporulation' I think you could use 'decreased number of asexual spores'.

image

If you look at the Table 3, they state they count the number of asexual spores/conidia

image image

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Hi @CuzickA, have made amendments to your suggestions above, thanks.

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Thanks @jingluodatacurator,

looks good, please could you add back in the missing conditions?

image

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Next steps

I think we have curated the main phenotypes now for this paper.

1) The missing conditions need adding to above by JL 2) AC to check AE alteration in archetype with Nichola

Then session will be ready to approve.

jingluodatacurator commented 4 months ago

Thanks @jingluodatacurator,

looks good, please could you add back in the missing conditions?

image

Hi @CuzickA, missing conditions have been added, thanks.

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Good job @jingluodatacurator, thanks

image

CuzickA commented 4 months ago

Next steps

1) AC to check AE alteration in archetype with Nichola

Then session will be ready to approve.