Closed ValWood closed 3 years ago
@ValWood which paper is this NTR for?
Do you mean parent term 'level of pathogen substance within host phenotype' or 'pathogen-induced host substance level phenotype' within PHI-branch or host only phenotype under single species parent 'altered level of substance in cell'?
. I guess we could assume that is is sugars derived from host cell wall although it isn't specified.
PMID:28082413
@ValWood is this what you had in mind?
Parent 'pathogen-induced host substance level phenotype' within PHI-branch
NTRs
decreased level of host reducing sugar induced by pathogen
def: A pathogen host interaction phenotype, in which the level of host produced reducing sugars usually present during infection is lower than normal.
increased level of host reducing sugar induced by pathogen A pathogen host interaction phenotype, in which the level of host produced reducing sugars usually present during infection is higher than normal.
Should 'apoplast' be in the term name?
That sounds OK.
I think we need to include "apoplast" here because they specifically assayed the apoplastic fluid, not total cellullar reducing sugars (I'm assuming there are pool of reducing sugars in the cell as a result of carbohydrate catabolism).
Updated to include 'apoplast'
NTRs decreased level of host reducing sugar in apoplast induced by pathogen def: A pathogen host interaction phenotype, in which the level of host produced reducing sugars usually present in the apoplast during infection is lower than normal.
increased level of host reducing sugar in apoplast induced by pathogen A pathogen host interaction phenotype, in which the level of host produced reducing sugars usually present in the apoplast during infection is higher than normal.
c89a2b5 Terms created, should be loaded tomorrow.
For new term requests, please provide the following information:
decreased reducing sugar level in apoplast increased reducing sugar level in apoplast standard def
Suggested parent term (Increased/decreased substance level) (I was looking for this term to use as a place holder, is it 'do not annotate'? If so we might need to let this one be annotate-able for a while until we have the subclasses that we need)
Please look in the hierarchy in a browser such as OLS
Attribution
If you would like a nanoattribution, please indicate your ORCID id