Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Other issues:
1. documentation on logging recommendation for connector developers
2. Reconcile logging file settings for multiple connectors, installer & manual
Cm
setup.
Original comment by jeffreyl...@gmail.com
on 18 Jul 2008 at 8:54
See also issue 107.
Original comment by jl1615@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2008 at 1:26
Original comment by mgron...@gmail.com
on 28 Jan 2009 at 10:31
This basically involves a style guide to the Connectors for standard logging
messages.
Original comment by mgron...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2009 at 10:02
Original comment by jl1615@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2009 at 3:58
Original comment by jl1615@gmail.com
on 25 Sep 2009 at 1:29
Original comment by jl1615@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2009 at 7:15
In addition to standardizing the logging levels, we should move all of the SPI
call logging into the CM, and log
the calls, the parameters, and return values, as appropriate. The connector
should not log information that the
CM has (i.e., parameters and return values, including document IDs and
properties), but only connector-specific
details that are not passed around as part of the SPI.
Original comment by jl1615@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2009 at 7:19
Original comment by mar...@google.com
on 4 Dec 2009 at 10:54
Original comment by jla...@google.com
on 24 Jun 2011 at 11:39
This issue is filed as Google issue #6514103
Original comment by tdnguyen@google.com
on 18 May 2012 at 9:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jeffreyl...@gmail.com
on 3 Jun 2008 at 9:03