Closed willfu closed 4 years ago
Yes. Only the results verified on the PC were posted in the README. I got Pi4 the other day so I will try to verify it when I have time.
thanks for the reply, is CPU the bottleneck? or the io? as you are the expert ;)
To put it simply, it is USB2.0 communication speed and CPU performance. Although it is a Japanese article, I would like to introduce the verification article of my acquaintance that I think is useful for you.
Edge TPU USB Accelerator analysis-I/O data transfer - Qiita - iwatake2222
Analysis of Edge TPU USB Accelerator-Operation and model structure - Qiita - iwatake2222
Thanks for the introduction, which is based on jetson nano and tpu, I will also have a test.
Pi4 + TPU x3 (Deeplabv3 + PoseNet + MobileNetV2-SSD) The PiCamera settings don't seem to work. The shooting speed has become very slow...
thanks for the sharing. is this the result of tpux3 ? very strange...
This is a sample of TPUx3. Because the camera shooting rate is only 10 FPS, the camera shooting speed is slower than inference. I think it works faster if the camera is set up correctly. Note that when 3 TPUs are used, all 4 Cores of the CPU are used up, so the CPU pre-processing and post-processing overhead is the bottleneck.
ok. Got it. thanks.
@PINTO0309 thanks for the work. I am curious about the frame rate on raspberry pi. do you have any data for that? the demo video are all from PC, right?