dyeany
commented
7 years ago Yes, we discussed doing this before and should come up with a scheme for application.
-- David Yeany Conservation Planning Specialist & Ornithologist Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 800 Waterfront Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Office: 412-586-2313 Mobile: 814-221-4361
-------- Original message -------- From: Christopher Tracey notifications@github.com Date: 3/20/17 9:58 PM (GMT-05:00) To: PNHP/COA COA@noreply.github.com Cc: "Yeany, David" DYeany@paconserve.org, Mention mention@noreply.github.com Subject: [PNHP/COA] weighting eBird data lower (#23)
Hey @dyeanyhttps://github.com/dyeany, For the habitat association work, it would be possible to weight the eBird Hotspot data a little less in the analysis. This may remove some of those spurious associations. Should I try it?
Actually, this doesn't necessarily have to apply to the eBird data -- any data set that is sketchy could be weighted less.
- You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/PNHP/COA/issues/23, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AQySeGHpGQpk0U6PGMWmywgq4Ew2F67Hks5rny6igaJpZM4MjPKR.
ChristopherTracey
Hey @dyeany, For the habitat association work, it would be possible to weight the eBird Hotspot data a little less in the analysis. This may remove some of those spurious associations. Should I try it?
Actually, this doesn't necessarily have to apply to the eBird data -- any data set that is sketchy could be weighted less.