Open jinshijian opened 4 years ago
Chris: Would the analysis be cleaner, with biases more apparent if you evaluated instantaneous values rather than integrated and scaled values for the year?
Jinshi: maybe we can use data from COSORE to do an additional test!
Measure interval: also using data from COSORE to do the test?
Temperature increase in all regions in the past 50 years;
And air temperature of 1990s (air temperature measure before 2000) is lower than that from 2000s (air temperature measured after 2000);
I collected 48 studies, each study have measured annual Rs more (or =) 5 years of Rs, and some studies has multiple sites (or treatment), totally I have 84 samples (for the first 5 years);
One study has 26 years of Rs_annual records;
Then, each study, I calculated the temperature and Rs_annual anomaly;
The temperature anomaly is as expected (increase trend because of global warming, see the figure panel a);
However, the Rs anomaly showed a decreasing trend! (see the figure panel b)
Why?
It is very surprising to find this result!
There is no difference between Q10 of 1990s and 2000s
There is no difference between Rs vs Tair relationship of 1990s and 2000s
Figure match the table format
I think Vanessa is thinking of this http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-6669-2016
Done this week
Surrogates
Revised according to reviewers' comments
Does this figure necessary?
SRDB-V5
Landmodels
Goal for next week