PNNL-TES / rcq10

1 stars 0 forks source link

Papers #4

Open bpbond opened 5 years ago

bpbond commented 5 years ago

Wang et al. 2014: Soil respiration under climate warming: differential response of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/gcb.12620 Here, we use meta‐analysis to synthesize 202 soil respiration datasets from 50 ecosystem warming experiments across multiple terrestrial ecosystems. We found that, on average, warming by 2 °C increased soil respiration by 12% during the early warming years, but warming‐induced drought partially offset this effect. More significantly, the two components of soil respiration, heterotrophic respiration and autotrophic respiration showed distinct responses. The warming effect on autotrophic respiration was not statistically detectable during the early warming years, but nonetheless decreased with treatment duration. In contrast, warming by 2 °C increased heterotrophic respiration by an average of 21%, and this stimulation remained stable over the warming duration. This result challenged the assumption that microbial activity would acclimate to the rising temperature. Together, our findings demonstrate that distinguishing heterotrophic respiration and autotrophic respiration would allow us better understand and predict the long‐term response of soil respiration to warming.

bpbond commented 5 years ago

Boone et al. 1998: Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration https://www.nature.com/articles/25119 Here we show that, for a mixed temperate forest, respiration by roots plus oxidation of rhizosphere carbon, which together produce a large portion of total effluxed soil CO2, is more temperature-sensitive than the respiration of bulk soil. We determine that the Q10 value (the coefficient for the exponential relationship between soil respiration and temperature, multiplied by ten) is 4.6 for autotrophic root respiration plus rhizosphere decomposition, 2.5 for respiration by soil lacking roots and 3.5 for respiration by bulk soil.

bpbond commented 5 years ago

Piao et al. 2010: Forest annual carbon cost: a global‐scale analysis of autotrophic respiration https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/08-2176.1 Ra is composed of growth (Rg) and maintenance respiration (Rm). We used a modified Arrhenius equation to express the relationship between Ra and MAT. This relationship was calibrated with our data and shows that a 10°C increase in MAT will result in an increase of annual Rm by a factor of 1.9–2.5 (Q10).

bpbond commented 5 years ago

Schindlbacher et al. 2009: Carbon losses due to soil warming: Do autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration respond equally? https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01757.x We combined a soil warming experiment with a trenching experiment to assess how RS, RA, and RH are affected. The experiment was conducted in a mature forest dominated by Norway spruce. The site is located in the Austrian Alps on dolomitic bedrock. We warmed the soil of undisturbed and trenched plots by means of heating cables 4 °C above ambient during the snow‐free seasons of 2005 and 2006. Soil warming increased the CO2 efflux from control plots (RS) by ∼45% during 2005 and ∼47% during 2006. The CO2 efflux from trenched plots (RH) increased by ∼39% during 2005 and ∼45% during 2006. Similar responses of RS and RH indicated that the autotrophic and heterotrophic components of RS responded equally to the temperature increase...The autotrophic CO2 efflux increase due to the 4 °C warming implied a Q10 of 2.9.

bpbond commented 5 years ago

Wei et al. 2010: Forest soil respiration and its heterotrophic and autotrophic components: Global patterns and responses to temperature and precipitation https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071710001458?via%3Dihub Here, we examine available information on SR, HR, AR, the contribution of HR to SR (HR/SR), and Q10 of SR and its components from a diverse global database of forest ecosystems. The goals were to test how SR and its two components (AR and HR) respond to temperature and precipitation changes, and to test the differences in apparent Q10 between AR and HR...The Q10 value of SR increased with increasing depth at which soil temperature was measured up to 10 cm and was negatively correlated with HR/SR. Our synthesis suggests AR and HR differ in their responses to temperature and precipitation change. We also emphasized the importance of information on soil temperature measurement depth when applying field estimation of Q10 values into current terrestrial ecosystem models. Q10 values derived from field SR measurements including AR, will likely overestimate the temperature response of HR on a future warmer earth. 1-s2 0-S0038071710001458-gr12 Greater phenological seasonality of AR than that of HR (Boone et al., 1998, Widen and Majdi, 2001, Tierney et al., 2003) could partly account for its higher Q10. For instance, apparent temperature sensitivities would be inflated if data from springtime root growing periods were included (Hanson et al., 2003). Furthermore, changes in substrate supply from photosynthesis could also largely be overlooked, resulting in additional overestimation of the temperature sensitivity of AR (Bhupinderpal-Singh et al., 2003, Davidson and Janssens, 2006).