Open dylanhross opened 2 weeks ago
Now I feel that the crosses are kind of an annoying way to depict fitted peaks. Little gaussian peaks (i.e. a gaussian peak only plotted over a range of +/- 2 FWHM of the mean) look much better and make it easier to interpret fitting results.
A snippet of how it should look:
x = xic_rt[(xic_rt >= prt - 2 * pwt) & (xic_rt <= prt + 2 * pwt)] ax.plot(x, _gauss(x, prt, pht, pwt), "b-", lw=1)
Vs. how they are currently plotted:
ax.plot([prt, prt], [0, pht], 'b-', lw=1) ax.plot([prt - (pwt / 2), prt + (pwt / 2)], [pht / 2, pht / 2], 'b-', lw=1)
Now I feel that the crosses are kind of an annoying way to depict fitted peaks. Little gaussian peaks (i.e. a gaussian peak only plotted over a range of +/- 2 FWHM of the mean) look much better and make it easier to interpret fitting results.
A snippet of how it should look:
Vs. how they are currently plotted: