Closed maxbriel closed 1 month ago
Yeah, the issue is, that the new interpolation class is asymmetric: there is now "no_MT", "stable_MT", "unstable_MT", and "stable_reverse_MT", which requires that "stable_MT" and "unstable_MT" can't be treated the same way anymore. I added a case for "stable_reverse_MT", where it was missing (see PR #281 ), nevertheless there would still be the option to get a reverse MT correctly treated in case it has the class stable_MT
beside stable_reverse_MT
.
Btw. it should now hopefully give Stable reverse mass-transfer phase
again, and never Unstable reverse mass-transfer phase
if the interpolation class is stable_reverse_MT
, but Unstable reverse mass-transfer phase
should be able for an interpolation class unstable_MT
together with MT forward and backward.
All cases should be solved, please reopen in case there are any issues found again.
In a population run, the
mt_history_HMS_HMS
becomesunknown
when theinterp_class_HMS_HMS
isstable_reverse_MT
.Originally this returned:
"Stable reverse mass-transfer phase"
The correct output would be
Stable/Unstable reverse mass-transfer phase
.