Closed ka-rocha closed 1 month ago
I've tested it for 5k binaries with uniform eccentricity. After looking through some specific models things look ok from what I can tell. Do you think we should run larger pop / some physical eccentricity distribution like thermal?
Do you think we should run larger pop / some physical eccentricity distribution like thermal? Those can be done in science projects.
But I'd more suggest a test, what happens if your initial conditions M1,M2,P are outside the HMS-HMS gird, but supported by the single star grid. E.g. those:
P_orb,M_1,M_2,e
10.0,4.0,1.0,0.1
10.0,300.0,75.0,0.1
10.0,100.0,2.0,0.1
10.0,100.0,99.9,0.1
0.01,100.0,25.0,0.1
10000.0,100.0,25.0,0.1
Another test would be to see how different the evolution is for a binary with e=0.
Update (July 18): @ka-rocha to re-test with new grids. Present results and examples next week during developers' meeting.
Update (Aug 1): The code looks good, but we need to check how good the matching is - from the detached step during initial evolution at HMS-HMS into the MESA binary grid. We are particularly concerned about the core masses (but rotation should also be considered). We will hold off on accepting until this check has occurred. @ka-rocha to look into possible options for saving/printing out similarity of matching grids/stars.
Currently ZAMS binaries are born with $e=0$. In order to allow for $e\neq0$ (for eccentric MT in the future ๐ ๐) we need to adjust the flow and introduce a new step
HMS_HMS_RLO_step
which will allow binaries to be initially evolved in detached step but then mapped to the HMS mesa grid as in theCO_HMS
andCO_HeMS
steps. (Made with @mkruckow, @ZepeiX)Here is an example of some code which runs this new setup. (Along with the RLO post-processed HMS-HMS grid in the POSYDON_data folder)
And the output from the population: black x's are initial_RLO after step_detached into step_HMS_HMS_RLO, blue are ZAMS, and purple show post step_HMS_HMS_RLO which have been circularized.