Open jared321 opened 10 months ago
@jmlarson1 I see that you now have a GitHub action for running black
on updates to pull requests. If all the python files pass flake8
, then why do they also need to make black
happy?
Black is certainly more restrictive than flake8, and I'm fine with relaxing the running of black
for PRs. I do think it's nice to know/see. (We can pull in without black passing, though.)
Does that mean that the PR will show a failure with the red "X" and we would just ignore that after checking that the failure is only due to the black
CI action? If so, do we want to have caveats tied to the interpretation of CI results?
My two cents is that black
is too restrictive. It wouldn't be an issue except that I don't like the idea of a tool changing my code unless I can be certain that I can check its changes, and black
can make that more difficult because it can make many "insignificant" changes. What if there are method developers like me that don't want to adhere to/use black
?
template_repo
Issue 4 and include Issue #100 in that