PROconsortium / PRoteinOntology

Other
14 stars 3 forks source link

Term issue: Request to add terms to PRO #338

Closed Astghik-S closed 2 weeks ago

Astghik-S commented 3 weeks ago

Dear PRO Maintainers,

As part of the OBO Foundry principles, we aim to ensure that terms are included in the most appropriate ontology and avoid duplication across ontologies wherever possible. We are working on a biomarker ontology (BMONT) and have identified several terms related to clinical and diagnostic metrics that may align well with the scope of PRO. Before proceeding to define these terms in our ontology, I wanted to reach out to ask if you would like to integrate any or all of the following terms into PRO.

The terms are as follows:

We believe they could add value to PRO if they are not already included.

Please let us know if you would like to incorporate any of these terms, or if you would prefer that we proceed with defining them in our own ontology. We are happy to collaborate and ensure these terms are defined in a way that aligns with OBO Foundry standards.

Thank you for considering our request. We look forward to hearing your thoughts and are open to any guidance you may have.

Best regards, Astghik Sargsyan Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI

nataled commented 2 weeks ago

Dear @Astghik-S, Thank you for your request. We will take a closer look, but at first glance it seems that lipoprotein a could be included. Both fibrinogen and Creatine Kinase-MB are already in PRO or GO, though you would need to verify that the terms as given correlate with your needs:

GO:0005577 (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0005577) fibrinogen complex PR:000050466 (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PR_000050466) fibrinogen complex (human) PR:000027247 (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PR_000027247) cytosolic creatine kinase complex, MB-type PR:000050356 (http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/PR_000050356) cytosolic creatine kinase complex, MB-type (human)

Please note that there are related creatine kinase terms in PRO, so these should be reviewed as well, in case another fits your needs better than the ones indicated.

Best regards, Darren

Astghik-S commented 2 weeks ago

Dear @nataled, Thank you for your quick reply. I understand that fibrinogen is already represented in existing ontologies, but I have some concerns about reusing these terms given the distinctions in biomarker contexts.

In particular, I aim to represent both fibrinogen and fibrinogen complex as distinct entities within my ontology. In clinical biomarker applications, these entities carry different implications: fibrinogen typically refers to the soluble plasma protein measured in routine assessments for inflammation or cardiovascular risk, while fibrinogen complex often denotes aggregates or bound states relevant to clot formation and thrombotic risk. Similarly, distinctions also apply to other biomarkers, such as cytosolic creatine kinase complex, MB-type and cytosolic creatine kinase. I would appreciate hearing your perspective on this approach.

Best regards, Astghik

nataled commented 2 weeks ago

Dear Astghik,

Fibrinogen--the soluble plasma protein--is a complex, hence the name (PRO simply followed GO's nomenclature). That is, so far as I can tell, they are synonyms. What you are referring to as 'fibrinogen complex' seems to be fibrin(?), the clotting factor derived from processing of fibrinogen. I did see something else called 'fibrinogen complex' which appears to be a mixture of many proteins but chiefly fibrinogen. As it is a mixture of proteins and not a single entity, that latter usage would not be in scope for PRO.

I am unclear as to the distinctions you need regarding the other two requested terms. Can you provide a bit more information on these?

Best regards, Darren

nataled commented 2 weeks ago

Following up on lipoprotein(a)...this is in scope for PRO, as it is a complex of apolipoprotein a and apolipoprotein B-100. Do you need a human-specific version, or only something generic (to any species)?

Astghik-S commented 2 weeks ago

Following up on lipoprotein(a)...this is in scope for PRO, as it is a complex of apolipoprotein a and apolipoprotein B-100. Do you need a human-specific version, or only something generic (to any species)?

Yes, human-specific is enough in this case

Astghik-S commented 2 weeks ago

Dear Astghik,

Fibrinogen--the soluble plasma protein--is a complex, hence the name (PRO simply followed GO's nomenclature). That is, so far as I can tell, they are synonyms. What you are referring to as 'fibrinogen complex' seems to be fibrin(?), the clotting factor derived from processing of fibrinogen. I did see something else called 'fibrinogen complex' which appears to be a mixture of many proteins but chiefly fibrinogen. As it is a mixture of proteins and not a single entity, that latter usage would not be in scope for PRO.

I am unclear as to the distinctions you need regarding the other two requested terms. Can you provide a bit more information on these?

Best regards, Darren

Dear Darren,

I get your point. But I would say they are not the same. The terms "Fibrin" and "fibrinogen complex" are more acceptable as synonyms. Could you please review the terms once again and make a decision. And maybe you would like to have it as synonym. Please let me know about your decision.

Please consider to recheck "cytosolic creatine kinase complex, MB-type" and "cytosolic creatine kinase, MB".

Thank you!

nataled commented 2 weeks ago

Hi Astghik, A few comments/questions:

Astghik-S commented 2 weeks ago

Dear Darren,

Thank you very much for the informative answer!

nataled commented 2 weeks ago

Dear Astghik,

Thanks for using PRO! If you are satisfied that your needs are met, please go ahead and close this issue.

Best regards, Darren

Astghik-S commented 2 weeks ago

Dear Darren,

Thank you very much! All good! I am closing the issue.

Best regards, Astghik