Closed snth closed 2 years ago
@snth It looks like the linux workflow fails: https://github.com/prql/homebrew-prql/actions/runs/3316049427/jobs/5477387112
Should we fix or remove that?
If we want to use brew, we can use a brew-action, which avoids us having to install it ourselves, and might even allow parameterizing a single action over Mac & Linux.
(We can also set it to run on PRs if we want to test it before merging)
I'm happy to switch to a brew-action. I don't know much about this space so happy to take any guidance.
If possible I'd like to park the workflow issues for a bit and fix some of the outstanding issues on prql-query. Both are required though for a 0.1 release. Any chance we can rope in some of the original brew contributors to fix this up?
Ah, sorry, I thought you added that, my mistake. Let me take a swing at it.
Any chance we can rope in some of the original brew contributors to fix this up?
Open source is a magical way of organizing, but one downside is that roping people in is difficult!
I just did something at https://github.com/prql/homebrew-prql/commit/9d8692f33c6c19cd2b39dee49770cbdf143515e2 — I mistakenly pushed to main without a PR. Let's see if that works though.
@max-sixty As per your suggestion, trying to see if I can get the homebrew workflow for prql-query working with the existing hombrew tap.