Open mikebentley15 opened 4 years ago
If we are changing naming, my two cents is that since we have “branches” the biggest one should be the trunk. Thoughts?
Or "stable"
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020, 23:10 Ian Briggs notifications@github.com wrote:
If we are changing naming, my two cents is that since we have “branches” the biggest one should be the trunk. Thoughts?
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/PRUNERS/FLiT/issues/329#issuecomment-657176117, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACBVGNEOVYCB4T6CIRX77P3R3FASRANCNFSM4OXP6SJA .
I'm rethinking using main
because it is actually not our main development branch. That title goes to the devel
branch.
You suggested trunk
to go back to SVN days and the idea that all branches come out of this one. That's not accurate in our case either, since we branch from devel
.
@IanBriggs What did you think of my suggestion to using stable
instead of main
or master
? Our old master
branch is intended to have only the stable releases of the software. I think stable
or latest-release
would better describe what it represents.
Thoughts?
Bug Report
Description
We would like to replace the
master
branch tomain
. This allows us to abandon "master" vocabulary which reminds some of a master-slave relationship.If there are any changes to make in the files of the repository, it will need to be done for all branches.