Open agustin opened 8 years ago
Shoryuken workers should receive those 2 args; you have to use shoryuken if not activejob, right?
For us, we only use announce with activejob.
On Oct 26, 2016, at 5:06 PM, olgalover notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi guys! me again, when I tried to create a subscriber that does not inherit from ActiveJob the gem seems that doesn't like it. For example:
class TestJob include Announce::Subscriber subscribe_to :subject, [:topic]
def receive_subject_topic(data) puts "data: #{data}" puts "subject: #{subject}" puts "action: #{action}" puts "message: #{message.inspect}" end end So when module Subscriber call the delegate_event(*args)(L19) passes not a single argument but instead 2, the sqs_msg and the body that when using ActiveJob the ShoryukenAdapter::AnnounceWorker class received and passed only the body.
My questions is do you want me to add a PR with this changes or this is moving out of the vision or idea that you had for the gem, in that case I understand it.
Please let me know in order to know how to proceed Thanks!
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@kookster yeap because shoryuken
needs those arguments but the Announce::Subscriber
module is the one defining the perform
and delegate_event
and this last one is only accepts 1 argument I added a tweak to the current opened PR showing it
I can define the delegate_event
on the class itself but feels that is against the purpose of having a gem with the module, WDYT?
I see what you did, I think that might be fine, but I'm wishing I had a non-activeJob test project to verify - I may have to make one.
Hi guys! me again, when I tried to create a subscriber that does not inherit from ActiveJob the gem seems that doesn't like it. For example:
So when module
Subscriber
call thedelegate_event(*args)
(L19) passes not a single argument but instead 2, thesqs_msg
and thebody
that when usingActiveJob
theShoryukenAdapter::AnnounceWorker
class received and passed only thebody
.My questions is do you want me to add a PR with this changes or this is moving out of the vision or idea that you had for the gem, in that case I understand it.
Please let me know in order to know how to proceed Thanks!