Closed codykallen closed 4 years ago
The second approach described above has now been implemented by PR #106. This is only applied for C corporations in with net income (not net loss).
A simplified version could potentially be implemented for the PassThrough
class, although the components of income are less detailed. For partnerships and S corporations, we have similar information on deductions, but less detailed information on revenues. For nonfarm sole proprietorships, we have richer information on deductions, but no detail on revenues. For farm proprietorships, the most recently available data are from 2004, so I do not think we can model this sector.
This has been resolved by #106.
The current approach to forecasting earnings should be improved to begin with BEA data and CBO forecasts, make adjustments for relevance by firm type (and industry, in the future), and then adjusted to align with IRS historical results. I expect the methodology to proceed as follows (with possible changes):
Note that this may involve splitting the Corporation class into those with positive net income and with negative net income. This would be further complicated by changes in the tax base, which could be problematic.
Another potential approach would be to begin with IRS information for 2013 and explicitly forecast each component of it. These would include
CFC
andDomesticMNE
classes)All of these could be set to grow at the same (or separate) rates, unless it is explicitly modeled.
Of these approaches, I think the latter is likely better, as we have explicit initial values for 2013.