Closed PThie closed 1 week ago
The first issue seems to only presented in the change data. The second issue is present in both change and level data (regional effects).
The second issue was intentional as I did not want to anonymize the combined values. However, as the values are not reliable with just one observation, also censor them.
The same applies
This could also be a test which checks if pindex is NA so should be NOBS
Another test:
There should not be a NOBS below the NOBS threshold set (PUF = 50, SUF = 5) If NOBS threshold is undercut, there should be no pindex and no NOBS
At grid level data, somehow not everything is anonymized given the 5/50 rule.
Only affects the combined index (I guess).