Closed Ovi3 closed 2 years ago
yes this is because of the operator in
this operator should probably be a function in v2
My current workaround is replacing "&&" to " && ".
By the way, any plan with v2 ?
Probably a version with generic in and output types next year. Depends on wether it works the way I envision it.
Cool. Thanks for your reply.
runing result:
My expected result is the first expression also working fine.