search

PalEON-Project / stepps-calibration

STEPPS pollen-veg calibration model code and paper.
0 stars 1 forks source link

Elicitation exercise results: remove Lower Peninsula from results? #1

Closed andydawson closed 9 years ago

andydawson commented 10 years ago

Right now it's included. Take it out of the summary stats.

SimonGoring commented 10 years ago

What is the elicitation excersise? When we assigned settlement?

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Andria Dawson notifications@github.com wrote:

Right now it's included. Take it out of the summary stats.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1.

andydawson commented 10 years ago

Yeah dude. We are leaving the MI:LP out of the calibration paper, but I need to remove those sites from the summary stats of the exercise.

SimonGoring commented 10 years ago

Okay, "Elicitation" just threw me.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Andria Dawson notifications@github.com wrote:

Yeah dude. We are leaving the MI:LP out of the calibration paper, but I need to remove those sites from the summary stats of the exercise.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1#issuecomment-60034230 .

paciorek commented 10 years ago

it's a fancy stat term for: "those scientists are not giving us enough data, so let's just ask them what they think and hope they know what they are talking about"

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Simon notifications@github.com wrote:

Okay, "Elicitation" just threw me.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Andria Dawson notifications@github.com wrote:

Yeah dude. We are leaving the MI:LP out of the calibration paper, but I need to remove those sites from the summary stats of the exercise.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1#issuecomment-60034230>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1#issuecomment-60036011 .

SimonGoring commented 10 years ago

I already stuck it into my talk :) On Oct 22, 2014 8:38 AM, "Christopher Paciorek" notifications@github.com wrote:

it's a fancy stat term for: "those scientists are not giving us enough data, so let's just ask them what they think and hope they know what they are talking about"

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Simon notifications@github.com wrote:

Okay, "Elicitation" just threw me.

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Andria Dawson notifications@github.com

wrote:

Yeah dude. We are leaving the MI:LP out of the calibration paper, but I need to remove those sites from the summary stats of the exercise.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <

https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1#issuecomment-60034230>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1#issuecomment-60036011>

.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/PalEON-Project/stepps-calibration/issues/1#issuecomment-60105214 .

andydawson commented 9 years ago

Now MI:LP has been digitized, we have composition results, and the cores from the MI:LP were part of our elicitation exercise we are thinking we should include it. Currently testing out some runs that include the full UMW domain to determine if there are any major changes in parameter estimates / results.

andydawson commented 9 years ago

Parameter results don't change much, and predicted pollen distribution maps are cool. It is back in the paper.