Closed VanshikaSabharwal closed 2 months ago
We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.
Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.
Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them. When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:
Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
:dart: Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
[!CAUTION]
Review failed
The pull request is closed.
The pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for issue management, specifically enhancing the automation of issue labeling. Key changes include renaming the workflow, updating the configuration to implement auto-labeling based on issue content, and revising the greeting message to direct users to a new repository for contributing guidelines. These changes aim to streamline the process of categorizing issues and improve user guidance.
Files | Change Summary |
---|---|
.github/workflows/issues.yml |
Renamed workflow from "Issues Workflow" to "Issue Workflow"; added auto-label configuration with defined labels; updated issue greeting message to new repository. |
Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
---|---|---|
Automatic labeling for issues related to dependencies, security, and design (#[2555]) | ✅ | |
Reduce manual overhead in labeling issues (#[2555]) | ✅ | |
Maintain existing functionality without renaming the issue.yml file (#[2555]) |
❌ | The file was renamed in the PR. |
🐰 In the meadow where issues bloom,
Labels dance, dispelling gloom.
With keywords bright, they find their place,
Guiding hands in a swift embrace.
A hop, a skip, automation's cheer,
Contributing made simple, oh dear! 🌼
[!TIP]
New review model
We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1279579842131787838) on our Discord.
New features
Walkthrough comment now includes: - Possibly related PRs: A list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. - Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file. Notes: - Please share any feedback in the [discussion post](https://discordapp.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1282535539299323995) on our Discord. - Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.
This PR has too many submitted files.
Please ensure the following:
Make your PR modifications based on the current develop
branch
Submit your PRs against our develop
branch.
Closing
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature request, security
Issue Number:
Fixes #2555
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Have you read the contributing guide? Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Updates