Test(organization_search_list): Improved Code Coverage

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 6 days ago

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR improves the code coverage of the organization_search_list.dart file from 79% to 94.59%, a significant improvement. These changes provide a solid foundation to further enhance coverage to 100% with the addition of a few more tests. The core functionalities of the file remain unchanged.

Issue Number

Fixes #1293
Furthered referenced in #1125

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos

Sample

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Not Needed

Summary

This PR introduces new tests for lib/widgets/organization_search_list.dart, located in the test file:
test/widget_tests/widgets/organization_search_list_test.dart.

Additionally, minor updates were made to lib/widgets/organization_search_list.dart to improve test compatibility while ensuring the core functionality remains intact.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other Information

Does not change core functions and provides a baseline for further improvements

Have you read the Contributing Guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Refactored organization search functionality to improve performance and user experience.
- Simplified rendering of organization lists for better responsiveness.
Tests
- Introduced a suite of widget tests for the OrganizationSearchList, including rendering and loading indicator checks (currently skipped).
- Enhanced organization search list tests for clarity and accuracy in UI representation.
- Improved test organization and assertions in the SelectOrganization page tests.
- Updated CommentsViewModel tests for improved clarity and maintainability.

coderabbitai[bot] commented 6 days ago

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant restructuring of the OrganizationSearchList class in the lib/widgets/organization_search_list.dart file. The class has been converted from a StatelessWidget to a StatefulWidget, introducing state management for refetch attempts. The error handling logic has been simplified, and the rendering logic has been modularized into new private methods. Additionally, a new test file organization_search_list_test.dart has been introduced, containing widget tests that cover rendering, loading states, and ViewModel initialization.

Changes

File	Change Summary
lib/widgets/organization_search_list.dart	Converted `OrganizationSearchList` to `StatefulWidget`; added `_OrganizationSearchListState`; introduced `_refetchCount` and a constant for max refetch attempts; simplified rendering and error handling logic.
test/widget_tests/widgets/organization_search_list_test.dart	Added widget tests for rendering, loading indicators, and ViewModel initialization, currently marked as skipped.
test/widget_tests/pre_auth_screens/select_organization_test.dart	Updated tests to use `CustomListTile`, refactored organization list population, and added assertions for UI rendering.
test/view_model_tests/widgets_view_model_test/comments_view_model_test.dart	Enhanced tests for `CommentsViewModel`, updated mock initialization, and refined assertions for clarity.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Unittests for widget `organization_search_list.dart` (#1293)	✅

Possibly related PRs

#2537: The changes in the main PR involve refactoring the OrganizationSearchList class, which may relate to the caching mechanism introduced in this PR, as both involve managing data presentation and state in the application.
#2567: The modifications in the main PR to the OrganizationSearchList class could be relevant to the volunteer management features introduced here, particularly if the organization search functionality is tied to event management and volunteer assignments.
#2581: The timezone handling changes may impact how dates and times are displayed in the OrganizationSearchList, especially if the list includes time-sensitive data related to organizations or events.

Suggested reviewers

palisadoes

🐇 In the meadow, we hop with glee,
Code is cleaner, as clear as can be!
Tests are written, coverage high,
For every search, we reach for the sky!
With each little change, our code does bloom,
A joyful rabbit, in the coding room! 🌼

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

🪧 Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

github-actions[bot] commented 6 days ago

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if either of these two conditions occur:

The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them. When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

Other

:dart: Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 5 days ago

hey @palisadoes please verify and merge, also help me out with this one. Should I push to develop:postgres branch or just develop works. Thanks

palisadoes commented 5 days ago

Please make sure coderabbit approves the PR

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 5 days ago

Please make sure coderabbit approves the PR

coderabbit approves it, just help me pass formatting pipeline and base branch pipeline ci

palisadoes commented 5 days ago

Please make sure coderabbit approves the PR

coderabbit approves it, just help me pass formatting pipeline and base branch pipeline ci

Please ask the #talawa channel in slack.

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 5 days ago

@palisadoes few doubts, should i update branch , should i change to develop:postgres. The code is completely working and here i am stuck with the ci. Please look into this

palisadoes commented 4 days ago

Please fix the failing tests

codecov[bot] commented 4 days ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 95.63%. Comparing base (ce1353f) to head (cfe9e1d).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop-postgres #2646 +/- ## ==================================================== + Coverage 95.51% 95.63% +0.11% ==================================================== Files 187 187 Lines 9884 9887 +3 ==================================================== + Hits 9441 9455 +14 + Misses 443 432 -11 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚨 Try these New Features:

Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

Dante291 commented 4 days ago

Since you made changes to UI file, attach a clip of that functionality working properly always, not required if your PR consist changes in only test files.

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 4 days ago

Since you made changes to UI file, attach a clip of that functionality working properly always, not required if your PR consist changes in only test files.

Hey, I appreciate your kind advice , although I am a bit tight on time. Here's a gist:

Aspect	new_organization_search_list.dart	old_organization_search_list.dart
UI Responsiveness	Handles retries dynamically with `ValueNotifier`, ensuring smoother updates and fewer manual retries.	Limited retry handling; less responsive in dynamic scenarios.
Visibility Keys	Uses unique keys (`orgTile_<id>`) for `VisibilityDetector`, preventing redundant fetches.	Constant key (`OrgSelItem`), risks duplicate behaviors or redundant fetches.
Customization	Encapsulates `CustomListTile` creation in a separate method, improving modularity and readability.	Inlines `CustomListTile` logic, making customization less structured.
Loading Feedback	Dynamically displays a loading indicator with precise state updates.	Displays loading indicator but lacks dynamic state management.
Performance	Slightly higher resource usage due to state management but offers a better dynamic user experience.	Lightweight, but less adaptable for dynamic or frequent updates.

There is no major UI change, its important for coverage pov

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 3 days ago

@palisadoes i did all the changes requested and achieved the code coverage. What more is needed from my side.

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 3 days ago

Explain why all the code was removed

I have restored that since I pushed the code that I was using for debugging

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 3 days ago

@palisadoes i am unsure about what's still failing, its just some warnings which do not affect us, moreover codecov coverage massively increases. please check this and help me merge this

palisadoes commented 2 days ago

Please fix the failing tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if any of these conditions occur:

1) The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository 2) Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold 3) The code does not comply with our linting check or other related formatting requirements

We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

ARYPROGRAMMER commented 18 hours ago

@palisadoes kindly check this one

PalisadoesFoundation / talawa