the panos_panorama_nat_rule_group (panos_nat_rule_group) is missing HA binding argument, making it currently unusable in our setup. note the ansible panos module and python panos SDK do support this.
Describe the solution you'd like
implement missing HA binding argument.
Describe alternatives you've considered
the NAT rules are now going to be automated using python SDK, while the != NAT automation is done using Terraform.
Additional context
our Palo Alto setup needs 2 NAT rule "instances" per NAT rule, one with active/active HA binding 0 and one with active/active HA binding 1.
Is your feature request related to a problem?
the panos_panorama_nat_rule_group (panos_nat_rule_group) is missing HA binding argument, making it currently unusable in our setup. note the ansible panos module and python panos SDK do support this.
Describe the solution you'd like
implement missing HA binding argument.
Describe alternatives you've considered
the NAT rules are now going to be automated using python SDK, while the != NAT automation is done using Terraform.
Additional context
our Palo Alto setup needs 2 NAT rule "instances" per NAT rule, one with active/active HA binding 0 and one with active/active HA binding 1.