Extracts are not assigned to particular work

PanditProject / Website

Communication repository for the contributors on https://www.panditproject.org

0 stars 0 forks source link

Extracts are not assigned to particular work #62

Open chakrabortydeepro opened 2 weeks ago

chakrabortydeepro commented 2 weeks ago

When I'm trying to add an extract it does not give me any option to select the particular work which the extract should be assigned to.
There are two dummy items as well. Should they be there?
Previously there was a provision to add "facts" in which we could mention folio numbers, lines etc. I think this function should be added.

Screenshot from 2024-10-22 22-34-33

roikedem commented 2 weeks ago

Hi Thanks for this bug report! It was fixed (PAN-217) and you can re-edit your extract entities.

Regarding facts, did you mean this part of the form?

(on the edit/add form, go to "publish" bulletin) If you mean the specific fields related to folios and lines, they are in the manuscript entity edit/add forms, under the Physical section. Please ask if this is not what you meant.

chakrabortydeepro commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks a lot, Roi. Yes, it works now. And I didn't see the options for facts in the "publish" bulletin. It is solved now. However, I have another issue related to the extracts. The extracts are shown under a "Work" item. However, they are not shown under the "manuscript" item. Extracts are taken from particular manuscripts. Therefore, they should be displaced under "manuscript" as well. For example, take the Work Gurupustikā: https://panditproject.org/node/114135 You can see that the extract appears in the "Work" column (although I think it should not be there— I had created an issue for it). However, if you go to its actual manuscript (https://panditproject.org/node/114141) you won't find the extract.

ybronner commented 2 days ago

Hi Deepro. You are right that extracts should be under manuscript, and they certainly shouldn't count as a work. I don't think you can now connect an extract to a work. I don't fully understand why this extract is connected to a work as a work. Roi, I think this is a bug that results from the import that we haven't noticed and that needs fixed. I checked other extracts (not thoroughly, though), and found that when you go from them to the work, you find them connected to that work as "works."