Open chakrabortydeepro opened 1 month ago
Hi Thanks for this bug report! It was fixed (PAN-217) and you can re-edit your extract entities.
Regarding facts, did you mean this part of the form?
(on the edit/add form, go to "publish" bulletin) If you mean the specific fields related to folios and lines, they are in the manuscript entity edit/add forms, under the Physical section. Please ask if this is not what you meant.
Thanks a lot, Roi. Yes, it works now. And I didn't see the options for facts in the "publish" bulletin. It is solved now. However, I have another issue related to the extracts. The extracts are shown under a "Work" item. However, they are not shown under the "manuscript" item. Extracts are taken from particular manuscripts. Therefore, they should be displaced under "manuscript" as well. For example, take the Work Gurupustikā: https://panditproject.org/node/114135 You can see that the extract appears in the "Work" column (although I think it should not be there— I had created an issue for it). However, if you go to its actual manuscript (https://panditproject.org/node/114141) you won't find the extract.
Hi Deepro. You are right that extracts should be under manuscript, and they certainly shouldn't count as a work. I don't think you can now connect an extract to a work. I don't fully understand why this extract is connected to a work as a work. Roi, I think this is a bug that results from the import that we haven't noticed and that needs fixed. I checked other extracts (not thoroughly, though), and found that when you go from them to the work, you find them connected to that work as "works."
"Extracts" section was added to manuscript display, I think it solves the problem, please check that it is as expected, @chakrabortydeepro @ybronner
@roikedem Thanks Roi! I can find extracts in the manuscript entries. However, the extracts are still listed under "Works" inside a Work entry. They should be listed under "Extracts" not under "Works." Here is an example from the Bālabodhinī entry:
When I'm trying to add an extract it does not give me any option to select the particular work which the extract should be assigned to.
There are two dummy items as well. Should they be there?
Previously there was a provision to add "facts" in which we could mention folio numbers, lines etc. I think this function should be added.