Open crazytang opened 5 months ago
If the 'from' is the msg.sender, it don't need to check the allowance of the 'from'. Otherwise it will throw a revert error.
function erc20TransferFrom( address from_, address to_, uint256 value_ ) public virtual returns (bool) { // Prevent minting tokens from 0x0. if (from_ == address(0)) { revert InvalidSender(); } // Prevent burning tokens to 0x0. if (to_ == address(0)) { revert InvalidRecipient(); } uint256 allowed = allowance[from_][msg.sender]; // Check that the operator has sufficient allowance. if (allowed != type(uint256).max) { allowance[from_][msg.sender] = allowed - value_; } // Transferring ERC-20s directly requires the _transferERC20WithERC721 function. // Handles ERC-721 exemptions internally. return _transferERC20WithERC721(from_, to_, value_); }
I have modified the following code
function erc20TransferFrom( address from_, address to_, uint256 value_ ) public virtual returns (bool) { // Prevent minting tokens from 0x0. if (from_ == address(0)) { revert InvalidSender(); } // Prevent burning tokens to 0x0. if (to_ == address(0)) { revert InvalidRecipient(); } if (from_ != msg.sender) { uint256 allowed = allowance[from_][msg.sender]; // Check that the operator has sufficient allowance. if (allowed != type(uint256).max) { allowance[from_][msg.sender] = allowed - value_; } } // Transferring ERC-20s directly requires the _transferERC20WithERC721 function. // Handles ERC-721 exemptions internally. return _transferERC20WithERC721(from_, to_, value_); }
If the 'from' is the msg.sender, it don't need to check the allowance of the 'from'. Otherwise it will throw a revert error.
I have modified the following code