Closed ghost closed 6 years ago
Which package using this icon name?
Shouldn't 'code-oss' linking to 'com.visualstudio.code.oss.svg' instead of 'visual-studio-code'?
They not repackaging VSCode but doing an OSS build if I interpret the package description correctly: "The Open Source build of Visual Studio Code (vscode) editor"
Also code-oss is the default product.json applicationName in the master branch.
{
"nameShort": "Code - OSS",
"nameLong": "Code - OSS",
"applicationName": "code-oss",
"dataFolderName": ".vscode-oss",
"win32MutexName": "vscodeoss",
"licenseName": "MIT",
"licenseUrl": "https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/blob/master/LICENSE.txt",
"win32DirName": "Microsoft Code OSS",
"win32NameVersion": "Microsoft Code OSS",
"win32RegValueName": "CodeOSS",
"win32AppId": "{{E34003BB-9E10-4501-8C11-BE3FAA83F23F}",
"win32x64AppId": "{{D77B7E06-80BA-4137-BCF4-654B95CCEBC5}",
"win32UserAppId": "{{C6065F05-9603-4FC4-8101-B9781A25D88E}",
"win32x64UserAppId": "{{C6065F05-9603-4FC4-8101-B9781A25D88E}",
"win32AppUserModelId": "Microsoft.CodeOSS",
"win32ShellNameShort": "C&ode - OSS",
"darwinBundleIdentifier": "com.visualstudio.code.oss",
"linuxIconName": "com.visualstudio.code.oss",
"licenseFileName": "LICENSE.txt",
"reportIssueUrl": "https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/new",
"urlProtocol": "code-oss",
"extensionAllowedProposedApi": [
"ms-vscode.references-view"
]
}
Related: https://github.com/PapirusDevelopmentTeam/papirus-icon-theme/issues/1774#issuecomment-502356812
Even better would be if the Arch maintainer would switch to the 'com.visualstudio.code.oss' icon, as it the official icon name for code-oss.
@Ghostium that makes sense. I did change the symlink. Thanks.
Symlink:
code-oss
Target:visual-studio-code