(Flavour) East Asian transcription schemes

[IohannesIohannium]

As an example, the city of Beijing could be written through different "orthographies":

• Pekin (exonym)
• Beijing (Pinyin, currently used)
• Pei-Ching (Wade-Giles, or English-based)
• Peiking (EFEO, or French-based)
• Beidjing (Lessing-Othmer, or German-based)
• Pej-t'ing (Czech customary transcription)
• Beycinğ (Turkish customary transcription)
• Бэйцзин/Beyczin (Palladius, or Russian-based)
• Pejćin (Polish customary transcription)
• Hokkyō (Japanese reading, could also be written in the West as Hokkyou, Hokkyô)
• Bắc Kinh (Vietnamese reading)
• Peitzin (Greco-Latin plausible transcription)

In theory we could make use of the GP system to determine which transliteration scheme would be used for Chinese locations. As an example, if China is a GP, Pinyin would be used; else, the highest ranking GP with a designed scheme would determine the orthography*. As an example, if England is No. 1, Wade-Giles would be used ("Pei-Ching"); if France, EFEO ("Peiking"). Localities known through exonyms or fixed customary transcriptions (like Hong Kong or Shigatze) would be left unchanged.

This, however, can not be extended to character name pools, which should be kept in the same scheme as vanilla Vic3 uses.

• Russian localization, if in Vic3, would keep using the Palladius system nevertheless; Chinese localization, if in Vic3, would see no change.

[CarbonY26]

Would like to two additional readings because why not:

• Bukgyeong (Korean Reading)
• Bwzgingh (Zhuang Reading which could be used for all Tai cultures)

[IohannesIohannium]

No renaming function seems to be existing for Vic3 as per now

[IohannesIohannium]

See #112 for additional ideas

[IohannesIohannium]

Impossible to implement due to forced staticity of hub names