Open GaelVaroquaux opened 4 years ago
The process was if a region had <6 parts in the y-axis, it was anterior/mid-anterior/middle/mid-posterior/posterior. Large regions like the middle temporal gyrus had a lot more subdivisions (11). So the 'middle posterior' was intentional but it seems confusing. Can we improve this?
What is the agreement here?
The labels are sometimes "middle XXX" ("middle posterior"), sometimes mid-XX "mid-posterior".
We should be consistent with them. I would favor renaming everything to "mid-XXX", to make things shorter.