soc-pe-bot
commented
6 months ago Team's Response
This is the expected behaviour of our program. Whether a past transaction should be changed by a promotion added later is debatable. Even if promotion start date is earlier than current date, in our design, promotion still takes effect only when it is being added. We understand that this could be an alternative approach to implement this feature but then we need a different design for this.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue response
Team chose [response.NotInScope]
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Suppose a user puts a wrong promotion, and makes transactions. After that, if the user makes amends to the promotions, why doesnt the transaction list update to show the updated revenue and the sell price? From the UG, i am unable to determine if this is expected behaviour. Hence listing this as a functionality bug.
Arent the transactions for the apple supposed to update cus the transactions were within the new promotion timeline