We should reconsider whether the specific sections of impact of, and reuse of, data and code, make sense to keep separately in the Reproducibility section. At the moment, they are very similar to existing indicators in the Academic impact section, specifically the indicator on Citation Impact and the use of code/data. We should either make clear how the entries in the Reproducibility section are different, or are interpreted differently, or remove them all together, and integrate anything that was covered specifically in the respective indicators in Reproducibility section in the Academic impact section. If we do decide to keep the separate entries in the Reproducibility section, it would probably be better to then refer for specific metrics to the other indicators from the Academic impact section.
We should reconsider whether the specific sections of impact of, and reuse of, data and code, make sense to keep separately in the Reproducibility section. At the moment, they are very similar to existing indicators in the Academic impact section, specifically the indicator on Citation Impact and the use of code/data. We should either make clear how the entries in the Reproducibility section are different, or are interpreted differently, or remove them all together, and integrate anything that was covered specifically in the respective indicators in Reproducibility section in the Academic impact section. If we do decide to keep the separate entries in the Reproducibility section, it would probably be better to then refer for specific metrics to the other indicators from the Academic impact section.