Dylan (@d2fong), analysing Pathway Commons pathway data in SBGN format, found a couple of abnormal terms, e.g. gene ontology ids that are used as compartment label instead of the corresponding ontology term - compartment name.
example:
Ether authors added several values, including ID (which is not alright) to the original biopax controlled vocabulary's terms, or it's due to our data integration/merging... Looks, it's rather the latter, because original Reactome has:
So, we are to fix such CV term values either in sbgn-converter (a quick fix to ignore ontology IDs), or - more appropriate - in the BioPAX Validator/Normalizer, or in the cPath2 data merger...
Dylan (@d2fong), analysing Pathway Commons pathway data in SBGN format, found a couple of abnormal terms, e.g. gene ontology ids that are used as compartment label instead of the corresponding ontology term - compartment name. example:
He asks whether it is possible to alter these values so that they are consistent?
So I dug into the code and reviewed the pathway data and found things like these (it's a piece of Pathway Commons BioPAX data converted to JSON-LD):
Ether authors added several values, including ID (which is not alright) to the original biopax controlled vocabulary's terms, or it's due to our data integration/merging... Looks, it's rather the latter, because original Reactome has:
So, we are to fix such CV term values either in sbgn-converter (a quick fix to ignore ontology IDs), or - more appropriate - in the BioPAX Validator/Normalizer, or in the cPath2 data merger...